For teachers
You move from source of answers to coach of reasoning
The best moment in a C5 lesson is when two students ran the same mission and reached opposite decisions. That is the moment you teach into, and the platform is built to produce it on purpose.
Class discussion mode
Project the scenario. Everyone votes. Then argue.
After a mission, the dashboard shows you the class tally: who chose what, which questions surfaced the hidden constraint, whose critique was sharpest, and where the class agreed too easily. These are the questions that go on the board.
The Pizza Party
- Who found the dairy allergy? What did you ask that surfaced it?
- The AI gave a price. Did anyone check whether that price included tax?
- Plan A feeds 37 students well. Is that good enough? Who decides?
You’re the GM
- What did you ask that changed your mind about Player A?
- Whose criteria were different from everyone else’s? Why?
- The AI was not lying. So what was wrong with its answer?
Mission to Mars
- Did anyone spend an item on something the habitat already had?
- What did "one item" mean to you? Did everyone read it the same way?
- Whose list would you actually want to be on Mars with?
What you’ll be asked
Three fair objections
- “Students will use AI to cheat.”
- In C5 the AI use is the assignment, and it is all visible. Students have to expose their reasoning, challenge the output, and justify a decision. Hidden AI use becomes assessable AI use.
- “AI will replace teaching.”
- The platform deliberately does not resolve anything. It produces disagreement — different students reach different decisions from the same scenario — and hands you that disagreement to teach into.
- “I don’t know enough about AI to teach this.”
- You don’t need to. Each lesson ships with a facilitation script, the student behaviors to expect, the common misconceptions, sample outputs, and the discussion questions. Prep is about twenty minutes.
In the teacher dashboard
Class competency profile. Five lines, plain-language reading. “Your class communicates clearly but accepts AI output without enough challenge.”
Students who need you. Surfaced by behavior, not by score — who never asked a follow-up, who never challenged anything.
Evidence, summarized. The quotes that justified each rubric level. The full transcript is one click away when you need it, and not in your face when you don’t.
Decisions and reasons. What each student chose and the sentence they wrote defending it. This is the part worth reading.